Tommy Poe (![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small} newblood04) wrote in onejdc, |
On Silverlight vs. Adobe...
MLB.com recently switched to Adobe and there are pros and cons. The major con is slower connections simply can't use the program at all. I bought a subscription to radio to listen to the Braves. $15, pretty awesome deal. I had used someone else's subscription before and knew my connection could handle it. In spring training, my connection handled it, no problem. But MLB signed a new deal with Adobe on opening day and have had many problems with the program. The feedback forum is full of people complaining.
Not sure if that helps in any way, but figured I would throw that out. MLB had bad things to say about silverlight, but if I remember correctly, adobe is a bigger resource hog.
*shrugs*
With the weather warming up, I'm planning on catching a few ballgames in Lynchburg. Want to go sometime?
MLB.com recently switched to Adobe and there are pros and cons. The major con is slower connections simply can't use the program at all. I bought a subscription to radio to listen to the Braves. $15, pretty awesome deal. I had used someone else's subscription before and knew my connection could handle it. In spring training, my connection handled it, no problem. But MLB signed a new deal with Adobe on opening day and have had many problems with the program. The feedback forum is full of people complaining.
Not sure if that helps in any way, but figured I would throw that out. MLB had bad things to say about silverlight, but if I remember correctly, adobe is a bigger resource hog.
*shrugs*
With the weather warming up, I'm planning on catching a few ballgames in Lynchburg. Want to go sometime?
